home | about us | contact | site map | credits | disclaimer | bookmark

Buzzluck: winnings confiscated on the basis of an increasingly confused and improbable series of excuses


Friday, August 07, 2009

Buzzluck: winnings confiscated on the basis of an increasingly confused and improbable series of excuses


Buzzluck is a relatively new casino using Realtime Gaming software.

There is no license information listed anywhere.

The terms and conditions page lists business registration and server location, neither of which exactly inspire confidence:


buzzluck business and server location



Buzzluck.com is a trading name of Egaming 2.0 SA. Egaming 2.0 SA is a company registered under the laws of Uruguay; with its address being Plaza Independencia 753 piso 7, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Buzzluck.com is registered as a gaming provider with hosting services out of Costa Rica.


These factors combined - software license with a provider many of whose licensee are problematic and a location in the weakest possible of banana republics - does not leave one with much confidence as to the solidity, financial or otherwise, of this nascent operation.


Buzzluck is one of the Casinomeister accredited online casinos.


I was contacted by a player from whom Buzzluck had confiscated winnings of €33,000, and who had unsuccessfully elicited the help of Bryan Bailey of Casinomeister. This large win was achieved through a combination of reload bonuses and a big hit on the slots.

The casino's justification was initially twofold:


• The player claimed a bonus coupon for which he did not qualify, not having clicked through from the appropriate affilate site, viz a viz Casinomeister.

• The player's telephone number was inoperative.


Neither of these excuses bear too much scrutiny.


Whether or not the bonus coupon in question was invalid is a somewhat beside the point, as the player never actually used it - the €33,000 slot winnings were achieved from an earlier coupon, so he never got around to redeeming the disputed bonus.

If he had used the disputed coupon, incorrect affiliate tracking could reasonably explain the issue - it seems rather unlikely that a player would willfully redeem an unclaimable coupon and create an obvious problem for himself.


As it stands, the coupon was never redeemed, and the winnings were achieved via an entirely undisputed bonus. But the casino saw it otherwise:


You were eligible for the same bonus anyway, but because you said you came from casinomeister bonus you will lose your winnings.



As to the disconnected phone issue, it seems beyond absurd and utterly unreasonable to deny so much money on the basis of a phone apparently not working for a period of three days! Would it not be fair to at least try a few days later?

But again, the casino had a different take on the matter:


Our security team tried on 3 separate occasions, Friday, Saturday and Sunday, to reach you at the number you listed on your account. On ALL three attempts, we received a message stating that this number is not in service. As opposed to the phone being turned off or out of range, an "out of service" message means that the line is not operational.

If the phone was off, as you mentioned, it would either go to your voice mail or request that the call be tried again later as the person in unavailable.

Ultimately, the number you provided was not operational, and therefore puts your account in breach of the General Buzzluck Terms and Conditions, to which you agreed when you created an account with us.



So, in summary: the phone was inoperational and the bonus code, which the player didn't actually use, was regarded as invalid.

On this basis was €33,000 confiscated.

Something doesn't add up; you don't take such arbitrary, draconian action on the basis of so little.


However, things got a little more confusing at this point.


On the basis of an enquiry from another affiliate, Buzzluck claimed that the €33,000 had not been confiscated because of inoperative phones and unredeemed bonuses.

The player was, in fact, a fraudster.


Strange that they somehow failed to mention this rather crucial issue at any point of the proceedings, preferring to offer those two rather weak excuses.

Buzzluck did, however, have a reason for not coming out with the fraud allegation sooner: they did not want other fraudsters to get any ideas, or otherwise expose their "fraud detection" procedures.


At this point, I remain as confused as before: how does a simple claim that a player is a fraudster tell anyone anything about anything beyond the simple ostensible fact contained in the words?


To summarise this affair:

• Player wins a substantial amount of money from new casino Buzzluck, licensed in a banana republic.

• Casino denies win on the basis of a couple of weak, doubtful excuses.

• After being pressed, the casino adds to the story with a more serious allegation, which was not, funnily enough, mentioned previously.

• No evidence for any of this is presented to anyone, beyond claims from Buzzluck Casino.


My take?


Buzzluck is not well funded, and paying €33,000 to one player would put a dent in the budget. When faced with the prospect of such a hit, a couple of weak excuses were cobbled together without too much thought as to the justifiability of such actions on such a poor basis. When it became apparent that more was needed, more was presented: a bogus claim about fraud, with no corroboration offered.

I think that is a reasonable hypothesis which fits the facts.


As general advice: don't patronise casinos located in banana republics on the basis that they happen to be recommended by questionable affiliates.


On a more specific note: do not patronise Buzzluck. If you do, then make sure you don't win too much. If you win too much, you may find that your legitimately-redeemed bonus code was in fact illegitimate.

You may also find that you phone suddenly doesn't work.


Either way, you will run the very strong risk of not seeing a penny of your money.



7 Previous Comments


This is very disturbing news

By Blogger sharon, at 5:42 am  


Hi I sent my affiliate manager this like and heres his response

hi, it was a case regarding a fraudulent account. It was brought up by both casinomeister and beatingbonuses and both cleared us. As for this specific website, we don't know who the person is and instead of him/her doing his due deligence and reaching out to us for clarification, he/she made that post.

By Blogger onlinbonusforum, at 5:59 am  


Thanks for the feedback.

1) I rarely, if ever, waste my time talking to rogue RTGs.

2) Assuming I DO talk to them, they will blow me off with the same uncorroborated nonsense they blew Casinomeister and BeatingBonuses of with. So why bother? Casinomeister bought it and, as far as I can tell, barred the player before he could comment; BeatingBonuses bought it in the main, and deleted all forum content after a fair discussion.

So much for a fair hearing.

3) This page ranks Google two or three for a search for "buzzluck".

By Blogger 100% Gambler, at 2:19 pm  


I've sent an email to the affiliate address listed, as they do not offer a player email - see the contacts page at Buzz luck.

If they respond, I will report on the matter.

By Blogger 100% Gambler, at 2:38 pm  


Thank you, please keep us posted

By Blogger onlinbonusforum, at 10:03 pm  


Do you have an email address for them? The only one available on the site is the affiliate one (the field in the player web form is actually to small for my HPG address, which is ridiculous), and they haven't replied.

By Blogger 100% Gambler, at 2:59 pm  


Many thanks for this info I thought buzzluck was a good place for players, no worth investing a lot of time in them, they can go bananas !

By Anonymous Allbonusbets, at 10:32 pm  


Post a Comment


May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | August 2006 | October 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | December 2011 | February 2012 | May 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | March 2016 | April 2016 | June 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | March 2017 | May 2017 | June 2017 | August 2017 | Atom feed
© 2005 hundred percent gambling

ONLINE CASINO NEWS

• Online casino news


2016

• Can't split 10s?
• Overbetting
• EV charts
• The IPCA
• Basic strategy master
• Back to the future
• Site hack

2015

• Better comp value
• Pit bosses are a pest
• 32Red buys Roxy Palace
• Winneronline is gone
• Paradise Win Casino
• Blackjack simple strategy

2014

• Court refuses Ivey winnings
• Phil Ivey versus Crockfords
• 32Red does the right thing
• Wizard Of Odds sold
• Gambling addict sues Ritz
• Better blackjack conditions
• FL: the beat goes on
• Phil Ivey and the Borgata
• LadbrokesFOBT profit
• Chat with the Met
• "Bonus abuse" and the Met
• Casino industry crooks.
• Debate to curb the FOBTs
• Labour idea to ban FOBTs

2013

• Ruby Fortune: terms buried
• Royal Vegas: bad outcome
• Russia illegalises gambling
• RV: player breaks no rules
• Gib casinos and UK laws
• The GGC (GRA) useless
• BetFred rigged games 9
• BetFred rigged games 8
• Betfred rigged games 7
• BetFred rigged games 6
• BetFred rigged games 5
• BetFred rigged games 4
• Phil Ivey: is he entitled?
• BetFred rigged games 3
• Betfred rigged games 2
• BetFred: rigged games 1
•  UK GLA Act 2013
• 888.com and Facebook
• Crockfords denies Phil Ivey
• Bad dealers
• Betfair Blackjack test
• Playtech software update
• Cheap blackjack
• Hippodrome Casino

2012

• The UK's FOBT addiction
• Conan Casino beware
• Intercasino misleading
• Fortune Lounge
• UK Gambling Commission

2011

• Small Claims Court
• Gamcare
• Full Tilt Poker saved
• Full Tilt ponzi scheme
• Casino Barcelona
• Irakli Kacharava
• Betfair processor no pay
• Full Tilt licensing meeting
• UK Gambling Commission
• Full Tilt Poker investors
• Full Tilt license suspended
• Twitter
• Betfair resolution
• Casino Web Scripts 2
• 32Red bonus marketing
• Casino Web Scripts 1
• Poker domains seized
• eCOGRA independent?
• Easystreet Sports theft
• Betfair to Gibraltar
• Rigged blackjack 2
• Betfair responses
• Rigged blackjack
• 888.com theft
• Betfair poker problem
• UK gambling controls
• Harry Reid

2010

• eWallet Xpress
• Kevin Stillmock
• Blog back up
• Betfair happy hour
• Ladbrokes bonus increase
• Absolute Poker tricks US
• Absolute Poker rigged
• Last position no difference
• Basic strategy simplified
• Online casino bonuses
• Righthaven LLC
• Ladbrokes bonus rules
• Malta LGA nonsense
• Purple Lounge theft
• UK affiliates issue
• Online casino problems
• GPWA code of conduct
• One Club Casino problems
• Rushmore theft resolved
• Realtime Gaming cheats
• Absolute Poker Ultimate Bet
• Rushmore Casino theft
• Ask gamblers service
• Intercasino bonus terms
• Profitting from poverty
• Gambling dooms UK to ruin
• Want To Stop Gambling
• Gambling Therapy
• Gordon Moody Association
• Breakeven
• Online gambling jobs
• Gamblock
• Gamble Aware
• Gamblers Anonymous
• Gamcare
• Video poker auto hold
• Gambling Wages help offer
• Blackjack double down
• Intercasino rules
• Tradition Casino warning
• Tradition Casino problem
• Be The Dealer
• eCOGRA approved casinos
• UK underage gambling
• iGaming Super Show
• eCOGRA reputable portals
• eCOGRA exposed
• Slots Oasis warning
• Slots Oasis problem
• HR 2267 comments
• HR 2267 proposed bill
• Search fully functional
• Gambling hearing delayed
• Betfair download blackjack
• Betfair blackjack
• The Federal Wie Act
• Casino Rewards warning
• Kahnawake dumps GP
• GP dumps Microgaming
• UK online gambling
• Gambling checklist
• Online casino problems
• Gambling Grumbles
• Casino Rewards
• Brian Cullingworth
• Casino Wager Tracker
• Grand Prive affiliates
• Jackpots Heaven Casino
• Kahnawake commission
• UK gambling problem
• eCOGRA and Grand Prive
• Bet365 misleading bonus
• Mastercard and Visa
• Online gambling rules
• 32Red sign up bonus
• Ladbrokes data theft
• Ladbrokes unfair settlement
• Palace group bonus rules
• Grand Prive and eCOGRA

2009

• Blackjack in the UK
• Seminole Hard Rock
• The APCW and MG
• Sportsbook.com
• Slot beaters slot strategy
• Rushmore Casino theft
• Paddy Power affiliates
• Slots
• 888.com problem
• The UIGEA
• Neteller contest winner
• 888.com bonus problem
• Casino Club meeting
• Online casino directory
• 32Red debit card bonus
• Blue Square Casino
• Budapest Affiliate Expo
• Rushmore payment issues
• Modern Blackjack volume 1
• Eurolinx certain insolvency
• Buzzluck winnings theft
• PaddyPower removed
• 32Red lawsuit
• William Hill Casino Club
• Betfair video poker
• APCW underage children
• Odds page updates
• VP Genius
• Video poker page updates
• Blackjack page updates
• Progression page updates
• Single deck page updates
• Betfair Playtech license
• Cherry Red Casino
• Online gambling debate
• William Hill & Teddy Sagi
• Rogue casinos section
• Pontoon correction
• Microgaming poker scandal
• Casino Club confiscation
• Casino Club steals €8000
• Villa Fortuna Casino
• Grand Prive affiliate issue
• CAP and Cardspike 2
• Virgin Casino bad results
• CAP and Cardspike 1

2008

• iNetbet removal from site
• Mario Galea and Malta LGA
• Cold Mountain Resort
• The AGCC
• Moneybookers privacy
• Virtual Casino rebranding
• Captain Jack Casino
• Royal Ace Casino
• Ringmaster Casino
• Catseye Casino
• Lucky Palm Casino
• Pharaohs Gold Casino
• Goldstream Casino
• Plantet 7 Casino
• Betfair bonus confiscation
• Malta LGA worthless
• The GIA
• Interwetten theft of £5000
• Lucky Ace winnings stolen
• The KGC and Absolute

2007

• HippoJo Casino
• Microgaming All Aces VP
• Neteller issues
• Lou Fabiano responds
• Lou Fabiano selling stats
• Betfair Zero Lounge
• ICE 2007 brief visit
• RTG cancels ICE visit

2006

• Crystal Palace Casino theft
• eCOGRA & Jackpot Factory
• English Harbour cheating
• Boss Media single deck
• Bella Vegas / Grand Prive
• The KGC worthless
• Gambling Federation
• Playtech sued
• Meeting Andrew Beveridge
• Playtech confirmed listing
• African Palace Casino
• G-Fed ICE discussion
• Playtech ICE meeting
• Playtech issues escalation
• Chartwell hands off

2005

• Crystal Gaming silence
• Price Waterhouse Cooper
• Crystal Gaming flotation 2
• Vegas Frontier
• Crystal Gaming flotation 1
• Playtech public listing
• African Palace & Indio
• Kiwi Casino
• Rochester Casino
• G-Fed theft 2
• Warren Cloud best avoided
• Golden Palace stupidity 3
• Golden Palace stupidity 2
• G-Fed theft 1
• Golden Palace stupidity 1
• Russia online expansion
• Wan Doy Pairs Poker
• Microgaming CPU usage
• Net Entertainment RNG
• Cryptologic & William Hill
• Casino growth slow
• English Harbour paying
• Fraudster or not
• Blackjack surrender
• Integrity casino group audit